Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know

Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know

Blog Article

While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you'll find that in many occasions, where by one of them is outlined the other are going to be too. Also, you'll find there is a fairly consistent romantic relationship involving them with regard to detailed loads.

I've used H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There aren't quite a few cartridges which i use it for as I look normally to gravitate to other powders. Nonetheless, I can not claim that it would not operate. It is simply that Various other powders perform much better for the specified cartridge. For example, during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really fantastic teams with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally superior in accuracy, while the velocity was nearly identical.

What is the main difference? Compression. With no Intense/large compression related to the long grain 7828, the stress curve was altered and the load fell aside.

Indeed you can. They are really the identical specific powder but the SC powder is just Minimize shorter so it meters much better.

INgunner54 reported: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams.

I know, rough periods. H4831SC will certainly operate, I just failed to like the case density when loaded long. I don't try to remember powder cost off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which is exactly where I commonly purpose being. With your circumstance using what you may have (and what I ought to have finished) I'd personally get started with the top with the bearing surface of the bullet right at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there once you look for a velocity node.

I don't like to work up a load working with one great deal of powder and afterwards have to operate up again since I run out and also have to get started on employing a new lot range.

If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps locate a load that works Alright Along with the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were in excess of 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the normal 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most significant bullet that would stabilize, but it did that wonderfully. It's a amusing-on the lookout bullet by using a rounded nose profile, however it h4831sc load data shoots terrific and kills properly. Deer out to about 150 yards al went down straight away with rib-cage hits.

At present working with IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. Other than it getting small Slice, what's the main difference in both of these powders, and should I switch to H4831sc?

Furthermore, it goes on to express that as a result of fshorter grains, that load density might be slightly bigger.

If there is not any load data it can be because this powder just isn't well suited for this cartridge. Normally 1 is not going to uncover one particular powder to suit all cartridges, along with the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're asking about will not function. Simply click to extend...

This is often an Serious extruded propellant and gives h4831sc load data heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

However IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will see that in several scenarios, exactly where one of these is shown the opposite is going to be at the same time. Also, you will find there is a fairly constant connection in between them in regards to listed loads.

IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. The place h4831 vs h4831sc there's a chance you're perplexing it and thinking that it really is near is H4831 and H4831SC are certainly similar. Those two are virtually the identical other than H4831SC is designed to lesser grains so it meters easier.